Titlebook: Reconstructing Research Integrity; Beyond Denial Barbara Redman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

Incorporate

facilitate

Science Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics, and Research Impact Assessment,iew, bibliometrics, and research impact assessment, each with limitations. Empirical work shows ways in which peer review can be unfair and how it might be improved. The widespread use of citation counts in decisions about scientific quality is undermining science’s ability to meet its core mission

售穴

Research Integrity in Emerging Technologies: Gene Editing and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Researcheral years) attention to social and ethical issues, leading to a need to discover and “clean up” harmful effects that should have been anticipated. A frequent assumption that the science/research community should direct development of the technology, is badly mistaken. Issues of justice related to a

MERIT

Lime石灰

Evidence-Based Research Integrity Policy,integrity decisions themselves. Research ethics, which preceded the broader notion of research integrity, developed largely without an evidence base, in part because it was broadly assumed that scientific institutions were operating honestly, precluding the need for documenting that they were, indeed, doing so.

吸引人的花招

Angioplasty

Manifest

思想上升

assail

Institutional Responsibilities for Research Integrity,tions operate with varying mixtures of science and market logic. Given disparate institutional interests, what portion of this responsibility can be managed through self-regulation by the scientific community?