找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Reconstructing Research Integrity; Beyond Denial Barbara Redman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 47508|回復(fù): 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:50:51 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity
副標(biāo)題Beyond Denial
編輯Barbara Redman
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/825/824234/824234.mp4
概述Exposes blind spots in scientific self-regulation.Identifies policies and practices that can support research integrity.Discusses ethics in emerging technological fields in medicine
圖書封面Titlebook: Reconstructing Research Integrity; Beyond Denial Barbara Redman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive
描述.This book exposes significant threats to research integrity and identifies policies and practices that can reverse these trends. It is focused on human research and US policy. Recent assessments have shown inadequacies in institutions, policies, and practices that seriously compromise ethics. The presumed self-regulatory nature of the scientific endeavor has been exposed to have allowed unabated areas of poor-quality science, an incomplete and inaccessible scientific record, conflicts of interest, differing notions of accountability, virtually no evidence base to direct research integrity policy, and a growing sense of alienation, moral injury and even revolt among scientists. .Reconstructing Research Integrity. aims to capture ways of vigorously moving toward scientific and ethical rigor, including self-correction and emerging or already-successful initiatives..The book begins with analysis of the full system of institutions, policies, and practices involved in production, dissemination, and application of research, including an examination of the blind spots in research ethics ideology, policy, and practice. The book then identifies policies and practices that can reverse harmfu
出版日期Book 2023
關(guān)鍵詞Research Ethics; Medical Ethics; Responsible Conduct of Research; Research integrity; Ethics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27111-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-27113-7
isbn_ebook978-3-031-27111-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity被引頻次




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity年度引用




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity讀者反饋




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:15:45 | 只看該作者
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Instruction Supporting Research Integrity, training, established during a time of resistance by universities of what they believed was incursion into their affairs, has not developed into a competence-based model necessary for research integrity.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:47:54 | 只看該作者
Book 2023an research and US policy. Recent assessments have shown inadequacies in institutions, policies, and practices that seriously compromise ethics. The presumed self-regulatory nature of the scientific endeavor has been exposed to have allowed unabated areas of poor-quality science, an incomplete and i
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:13:49 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:11:08 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:27:35 | 只看該作者
Blind Spots in Research Integrity Policy: How to Identify and Resolve Them, guiding/regulating a field must regularly be examined through alternate lenses to find currently out-of-favor views that might suggest a solution to a problem. An example is the current conceptualization of research misconduct including its depiction in regulation. Current policy requires a good fa
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:35:31 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:14:16 | 只看該作者
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Instruction Supporting Research Integrity,ning emanating from individuals, scientific societies, and institutions employing scientists. Such a system does not exist. Mentorship for young researchers is apparently of uneven quality and largely not regulated by universities. The current model of socialization by osmosis might better be replac
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:25:40 | 只看該作者
,Emerging, Evolving Self-Regulation by?the Scientific Community,ifted in the direction of democratization, requiring focus on social responsibility and some regulatory oversight. The Institutional Corruption framework, broadly applied across societal activities, requires that science must be true to its core purpose and not diverted from it by institutional prac
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:31:53 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-19 07:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
东乡县| 杭锦后旗| 乌兰县| 漳浦县| 顺义区| 安顺市| 慈溪市| 托里县| 丰县| 滨海县| 米林县| 汉沽区| 嘉黎县| 柳河县| 山阳县| 铅山县| 尚志市| 和田县| 福建省| 馆陶县| 永年县| 景洪市| 那曲县| 微博| 玉龙| 江孜县| 恭城| 云霄县| 安阳市| 腾冲县| 威宁| 裕民县| 汶川县| 德阳市| 柳河县| 荔浦县| 明水县| 杭锦后旗| 宽甸| 周口市| 平舆县|