找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Reconstructing Research Integrity; Beyond Denial Barbara Redman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

[復制鏈接]
查看: 47503|回復: 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:50:51 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity
副標題Beyond Denial
編輯Barbara Redman
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/825/824234/824234.mp4
概述Exposes blind spots in scientific self-regulation.Identifies policies and practices that can support research integrity.Discusses ethics in emerging technological fields in medicine
圖書封面Titlebook: Reconstructing Research Integrity; Beyond Denial Barbara Redman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive
描述.This book exposes significant threats to research integrity and identifies policies and practices that can reverse these trends. It is focused on human research and US policy. Recent assessments have shown inadequacies in institutions, policies, and practices that seriously compromise ethics. The presumed self-regulatory nature of the scientific endeavor has been exposed to have allowed unabated areas of poor-quality science, an incomplete and inaccessible scientific record, conflicts of interest, differing notions of accountability, virtually no evidence base to direct research integrity policy, and a growing sense of alienation, moral injury and even revolt among scientists. .Reconstructing Research Integrity. aims to capture ways of vigorously moving toward scientific and ethical rigor, including self-correction and emerging or already-successful initiatives..The book begins with analysis of the full system of institutions, policies, and practices involved in production, dissemination, and application of research, including an examination of the blind spots in research ethics ideology, policy, and practice. The book then identifies policies and practices that can reverse harmfu
出版日期Book 2023
關鍵詞Research Ethics; Medical Ethics; Responsible Conduct of Research; Research integrity; Ethics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27111-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-27113-7
isbn_ebook978-3-031-27111-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity被引頻次




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity年度引用




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity讀者反饋




書目名稱Reconstructing Research Integrity讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:15:45 | 只看該作者
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Instruction Supporting Research Integrity, training, established during a time of resistance by universities of what they believed was incursion into their affairs, has not developed into a competence-based model necessary for research integrity.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:47:54 | 只看該作者
Book 2023an research and US policy. Recent assessments have shown inadequacies in institutions, policies, and practices that seriously compromise ethics. The presumed self-regulatory nature of the scientific endeavor has been exposed to have allowed unabated areas of poor-quality science, an incomplete and i
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:13:49 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:11:08 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:27:35 | 只看該作者
Blind Spots in Research Integrity Policy: How to Identify and Resolve Them, guiding/regulating a field must regularly be examined through alternate lenses to find currently out-of-favor views that might suggest a solution to a problem. An example is the current conceptualization of research misconduct including its depiction in regulation. Current policy requires a good fa
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:35:31 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:14:16 | 只看該作者
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Instruction Supporting Research Integrity,ning emanating from individuals, scientific societies, and institutions employing scientists. Such a system does not exist. Mentorship for young researchers is apparently of uneven quality and largely not regulated by universities. The current model of socialization by osmosis might better be replac
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:25:40 | 只看該作者
,Emerging, Evolving Self-Regulation by?the Scientific Community,ifted in the direction of democratization, requiring focus on social responsibility and some regulatory oversight. The Institutional Corruption framework, broadly applied across societal activities, requires that science must be true to its core purpose and not diverted from it by institutional prac
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:31:53 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-19 01:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
漯河市| 响水县| 洛隆县| 冷水江市| 和顺县| 万盛区| 甘南县| 武宣县| 海丰县| 柳河县| 甘谷县| 马关县| 黄浦区| 白河县| 寿宁县| 三都| 广东省| 舞阳县| 重庆市| 白山市| 东港市| 赫章县| 孝义市| 会东县| 宁晋县| 上栗县| 株洲市| 永吉县| 大庆市| 唐河县| 铅山县| 仁化县| 高密市| 永嘉县| 梧州市| 独山县| 达孜县| 枞阳县| 剑河县| 蒲江县| 河源市|