Titlebook: Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts; an analytic study E. F. Grinten Book 1969 Martinus Nijhoff / The Hague 1969 Middle Ages.M

強烈的愿望

書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts被引頻次




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts年度引用




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts讀者反饋




書目名稱Elements of Art Historiography in Medieval Texts讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

來自于

免費

高度

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3010-3is way one speaks of gothic, impressionistic, classicistic, Venetian etc. During the Middle Ages this way of indicating style, referring to one particular work of art and adding a substantive, was the only one known. The most common substantives are: . and .. The practice of using substantives deriv

Urgency

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3024-0 to the work of art. In Book XXXIV.xviii.47 he mentions two chased cups from the hand of Calamis in connection with facsimiles made of them by the sculptor Zenodor. (A89) In Book XXXV.xxxvi.91 Pliny mentions a panel representing Venus rising up from the sea, painted by Apelles, which panel had been

真繁榮

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2248-1rtists from the (especially Greek) past is known in broad outline. In his Books XXXIV and XXXV he has recorded as much as possible about this; he gives first-, second- or thirdhand enumerations of artists, he relates anecdotal or historical particulars from their lives, some characteristics of their

真繁榮

photopsia

aggressor

過于平凡

Major Companies of THE PHILIPPINES,by the author himself or on communications and descriptions from contemporaries or older authors. The use of words like ., . or . is often to be regarded as a somewhat careless way of expression rather than an indication of a direct rendering of a real observation.