Titlebook: Critical Discursive Psychology; Ian Parker Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002 Critical Psycholo

Servile

討好美人

generality of their evidence, should be wary of attributing causality to discourse, and should consider the advantages of systematically investigating, rather than asserting, the social consequences of the use of different discourses.

不合

聲音刺耳

LASH

炸壞

制定

Latency

Against Against-ismf modernism, employs ‘dialectical critique’ to historically contextualize postmodernism and its dangers. As postmodernists Parker takes to task, the authors argue that the relevant points of difference between him and them have more to do with their differing institutional locations and conception/practices of dialectics than with postmodernism.

大漩渦

Reference Points for Critical Theoretical Work in Psychologyhere are deep problems with Wittgenstein’s work as the underpinning for a critical position in psychology, as I argued in my chapter, but we can still, paradoxically, understand why that may be so by taking seriously some of the insights in Wittgenstein’s own writing.

Astigmatism