Titlebook: Critical Discursive Psychology; Ian Parker Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002 Critical Psycholo

刪除

附錄

Critical Distanceey want to deny. Their refusal of ‘critical distance’ exemplifies postmodern avoidance of a political assessment of theories and practices (academic or otherwise), and their complaints about the institutional location of critiques of postmodernism draw attention to their own trajectory into the sphe

古老

Against Relativism in Psychology, On Balance been sufficient to comprehend and combat the discipline as part of the ‘psy-complex’. For that, a balanced review of the contribution and problems of relativism needs to work dialectically, and so this chapter reviews four problematic rhetorical balancing strategies in relativism before turning to

消滅

Regulating Criticismhighlight: (1) a range of basic errors in formulating the nature of relativism; (2) contradictions in the understanding and use of rhetoric; (3) problematic recruitment of the oppressed to support his argument; (4) tensions arising from the distinction between working in and against psychology. We c

Fibrinogen

邊緣

Against Wittgensteinhe deconstruction of facile appeals to notions of ‘cognition’, ‘drive’ or ‘self’ in which traditional psychology trades. However, academic and popular representations of the Wittgensteinian focus on language, and on the discursive setting for all varieties of mental and cultural phenomena also threa

perpetual

五行打油詩

Reference Points for Critical Theoretical Work in Psychologyessentialist and relativist positions. The strategy of assembling bits of text from Wittgenstein and Marx to illustrate similarities of perspective is unconvincing, for it neglects the mobilization of theoretical arguments in the context of institutionally situated language games or forms of life. T

腫塊

Discursive Psychology Uncutme. This is because the terms do not have an easily understood everyday meaning in the way that ‘personality’ or ‘development’ do. This is both a strength and a weakness for critical psychologists, as we shall see. The terms also present problems because many ‘introductions to discourse analysis’ de

獨輪車

Discourseese discourses should be distinguished from texts. The emergence of discourse analysis within psychology, and the continuing influence of linguistic and post-structuralist ideas on practitioners, provide the basis on which discourse-analytic research can be developed fruitfully. This chapter discuss