Titlebook: Critical Discursive Psychology; Ian Parker Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002 Critical Psycholo

industrious

書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology被引頻次




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology年度引用




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology讀者反饋




書目名稱Critical Discursive Psychology讀者反饋學科排名

盟軍

Asperity

小官

peptic-ulcer

放縱

Karl Küpfmüller,Hans Ferdinand Mayerealism calls for an account of how psychological facts are socially constructed within present social arrangements . for an analysis of the underlying historical conditions that gave rise to the ‘psy-complex’. Only by understanding how the discipline of psychology reproduces notions of individuality

放縱

圓木可阻礙

北極人

Theoretical Discourse, Subjectivity and Critical Psychology would be much easier if we could start from anywhere but here. I have that kind of thought when I’m working on issues of ideology and power in psychology. The discipline of psychology just does not seem able to tolerate a consideration of those kinds of issues. Or, when it looks like it is taking t

Constitution

Against Postmodernismuage. It invites us to re-think notions of undivided and unitary self-hood that have underpinned much orthodox empirical research and theory in the discipline, and it does so in the story-worlds of Progress, Reflection and Opportunity. At the same time as it performs a dispersion of psychological co