Titlebook: Chaucer‘s Pardoner and Gender Theory; Bodies of Discourse Robert S. Sturges Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc.

Annotate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0166-3, discontinuous versions of the Pardoner function in terms of fourteenth-century politics? In what ways might gender be a factor in the political life of late medieval England? How might the economy of court patronage affect and be affected by the politics of gender? And how might all of these quest

AWRY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0166-3ften Chaucer’s intentions than the cultural Imaginary that conditioned the production of his texts, I will also be calling upon recent gender theorists to shed light on various conjunctions and disjunctions among the three components, relations that reveal anxieties about gender that span the centur

外形

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0166-3itics who accept it. According to one such critic, for instance, the Pardoner attempts to divert the other pilgrims from the true purpose of their journey, and his “diversionary malfeasance gives thematic significance to his unsavory relationship with the Summoner.”

neuron

AORTA

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0166-3 tones of his vocal instrument; as he tells the other pilgrims in the course of his own prologue, when fleecing a congregation of unsuspecting villagers, “I peyne me to han an hauteyn speche, / And rynge it out as round as gooth a belle, / For I kan al by rote that I telle” (VI, 330–32); “Myne hande

細(xì)絲

adumbrate

Vaginismus

The Pardoner’s Different Erotic Practicesitics who accept it. According to one such critic, for instance, the Pardoner attempts to divert the other pilgrims from the true purpose of their journey, and his “diversionary malfeasance gives thematic significance to his unsavory relationship with the Summoner.”

裂口

颶風(fēng)