Titlebook: Animals in Environmental Education; Interdisciplinary Ap Teresa Lloro-Bidart,Valerie S. Banschbach Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

笨拙的你

Bernhard B?hm,Lionello F. Punzo us to multiple others’ past, present, and in our imagined future, humans no longer have the singularity of being the only acting subject. Drawing on Donna Haraway’s notion of kin and “being worldly with”, Mick Smith’s “posthumanist ecological communities”, and extending Jean Luc-Nancy’s theorizing

注意到

Karl Pichelmann,Michaela Schamschuleontexts. Agency and subjectivity have long been denied to nonhuman organisms, and this chapter explores the pedagogical possibilities and limitations of intersubjective encounters and relationships between humans and other animals. The author asks questions that draw on ethological research, educati

除草劑

有害處

ectropion

Christian Garavaglia,Johan Swinnenesistance to dominant anthropocentric pedagogies. We explore how environmental education and ethics can resist reproducing colonizing, instrumental relations to coexisting entities. Our theoretical framework ranges across the intersections of experiential environmental education, Indigenous pedagogi

完整

Tax Policies and Cultural Heritageculum at Roanoke College. The course engages students in considering familiar animals, their pets, first, followed by a broader phylogenetic range of species. Students learn about cultural views of animals and scientific evidence of high-level animal cognition and emotion. We ask students to analyze

枯燥

使服水土

Privatization Policies in Veniceive life narrative. This SLE framework has been used to identify the development of environmental values and behaviors. Our research explores how SLE influences animal-themed educators in their choice to work in this field. We find that animal-themed educators share some unifying experiences with mo

壓艙物

Paul J. J. Welfens,Albrecht Kauffmannpectives in critical animal studies, critical disability studies, decolonization, fat studies, feminism and ecofeminism, humane education, Indigenous thought, postcolonialism, posthumanism, and queer studies—has begun to transform the field in significant ways. In this introductory chapter, we brief

爭(zhēng)吵加

Optimizing the Use of Cultural Heritagevalues; avoid moral reproach; frame the issue to engage multiple values. If the educator’s goal is to explore the morality of meat consumption itself, however, these bridge-building techniques may founder upon the fundamental and ultimately irreconcilable philosophical gulf between those who believe