找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them; Hannu Nurmi Book 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999 Elections.Electorial System.Socia

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 49722|回復(fù): 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:29:24 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them
編輯Hannu Nurmi
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/986/985084/985084.mp4
概述classification of numerous voting paradoxes * includes suggestions for practical voting system design
圖書封面Titlebook: Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them;  Hannu Nurmi Book 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999 Elections.Electorial System.Socia
描述Voting paradoxes are unpleasant surprises encountered in voting. Typically they suggest that something is wrong with the way in- dividual opinions are being expressed or processed in voting. The outcomes are bizarre, unfair or otherwise implausible, given the expressed opinions of voters. Voting paradoxes have an important role in the history of social choice theory. The founding fathers of the theory, Marquis de Condorcet and Jean-Charles de Borda, were keenly aware of some of them. Indeed, much of the work of these and other forerunners of the modern social choice theory dealt with ways of avoiding paradoxes related to voting. One of the early paradoxes, viz. that bearing the name of Condorcet, has subsequently gained such a prominent place in the literature that it is sometimes called the paradox of voting. One of the aims of the present work is to show that Condorcet‘s is but one of many paradoxes of voting. Some of these are pretty closely interrelated making it meaningful to classify them. This is the second main aim of this book. The third objective is to suggest ways of dealing with paradoxes. Since voting is and has always been an essential instrument of democratic rule, i
出版日期Book 1999
關(guān)鍵詞Elections; Electorial System; Social Choice; Voting; Voting Paradox; Voting Systems; Wahlen; Wahlparadoxon;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03782-9
isbn_softcover978-3-642-08551-2
isbn_ebook978-3-662-03782-9
copyrightSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them被引頻次




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them年度引用




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them讀者反饋




書目名稱Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:55:31 | 只看該作者
Paradoxes of the Enlightenment Era,result-the social choice — would bear a reasonable relation to the opinions. Borda’s view was thus in a sense instrumental: voting procedures are methods of combining individual opinions and some methods are better than others with respect to certain criteria.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:21:15 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:16:05 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:06:09 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:47:12 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:36:23 | 只看該作者
Basic Concepts and Tools,y be candidates to offices (as . in presidential elections), policy alternatives (as . in legislative voting) or stands on some issues (as . in jury decision making). In the theory of voting the alternatives are often regarded as given.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:37:02 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:18:21 | 只看該作者
The Geometry of Voting,ve sets of any cardinality, it is particularly illuminating in three-alternative cases. The technique is based on a representation of preference profiles as geometric objects; in the case of three alternatives, these objects are equilateral triangles.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:47:49 | 只看該作者
The Paradoxical Act of Voting,ny countries most — eligible people vote even though the effect of their vote is very marginal and they incur real costs in voting? Certainly people vote for a number of reasons and, thus, suggesting that one motive, .. instrumental, may be absent is hardly sufficient to make the act of voting parad
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 10:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
敦化市| 青神县| 焦作市| 达拉特旗| 礼泉县| 龙门县| 蚌埠市| 长治县| 南郑县| 普兰县| 新野县| 林口县| 九龙坡区| 鱼台县| 河津市| 南岸区| 犍为县| 稷山县| 连城县| 云南省| 通榆县| 甘泉县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 隆化县| 石门县| 大城县| 朔州市| 四平市| 谷城县| 清涧县| 临西县| 龙陵县| 金阳县| 温宿县| 集安市| 曲阳县| 丹东市| 天津市| 当阳市| 遂昌县| 沭阳县|