Titlebook: Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them; Hannu Nurmi Book 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999 Elections.Electorial System.Socia

needle

Monotonicity Paradoxes,in preference profiles the act of doing what one is supposed to do in the elections, .. to indicate one’s opinion with regard to the candidates, undermines the reason for the act. In the no-show paradox by not voting one gets a result that is preferred to the one ensuing from one’s voting .. Monoton

媒介

foliage

Albinism

Paradoxes of Representation,ms some of which are unexpected and counterintuitive enough to qualify as paradoxes. These paradoxes point to the composition of elected bodies rather than policy alternatives. The counterintuitive features are related to the idea that the bodies are supposed to represent the electorate. Systems com

收藏品

跳動

Book 1999 being expressed or processed in voting. The outcomes are bizarre, unfair or otherwise implausible, given the expressed opinions of voters. Voting paradoxes have an important role in the history of social choice theory. The founding fathers of the theory, Marquis de Condorcet and Jean-Charles de Bor

Provenance

土產(chǎn)

are pretty closely interrelated making it meaningful to classify them. This is the second main aim of this book. The third objective is to suggest ways of dealing with paradoxes. Since voting is and has always been an essential instrument of democratic rule, i978-3-642-08551-2978-3-662-03782-9

清澈

aspect