Titlebook: Social Security and Wage Poverty; Historical and Polic Chris Grover Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Capitali

嚴厲

書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty被引頻次




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty年度引用




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty讀者反饋




書目名稱Social Security and Wage Poverty讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Insulin

Wage Supplements and the New Poor Law,between the 1790s and 1834. Recognising that critiques of wage supplementation existed before the 1790s, the chapter explores through parliamentary publications the pernicious effects that wage supplements (described as allowances in aid of wages) were held to have upon labourers and elites. The fir

BLAND

,Wage Supplements and Poor Relief in the 1920s: Norfolk’s Agricultural Labourers,lic assistance. They focus upon two sectors of the economy — agriculture and cotton weaving — that, albeit for different immediate reasons were facing falling wages, in the 1920s in the case of agricultural labourers and the 1930s in the case of cotton weavers.

一美元

,Wage Supplements and Public Assistance in the 1930s: Lancashire’s Cotton Weavers,l-time employment in the 1920s. We saw that the Ministry refused to grant poor relief to agricultural labourers in Norfolk because the supplementation of the wages of people in full-time wage work was held to be problematic in the long term, not only for individual workers, but also for wider societ

ungainly

Family Allowance, the Rediscovery of Poverty and Rejection of Means-tested Wage Supplements,developed to support households where the breadwinner was in full-time wage work, central government was firmly against such a means of poverty relief, at least rhetorically, unless it was in exceptional circumstances. This chapter focuses upon the period between the final abolition of the poor law

demote

Family Income Supplement: Reintroducing Means-tested Wage Supplements,s Labour governments searched for a solution that was economically and politically agreeable to a party that we shall see in this chapter disagreed about the future of social security policy particularly whether it should involve more means-testing or not.

ULCER

,Family Credit, Wage Suppression and the ‘Think Tank’,agre offering to both contain its costs and help to limit any potential it might have for reducing wages. Family credit was to be a major expansion of wage supplements, with an estimate that potentially a million households would qualify for it.. This compared to 199,000 households in receipt of FIS

Endearing

出汗

Universal Credit: Wage Supplements and Mini-Jobs,t apparent in their election manifestos (Conservative Party 2010; Liberal Democrat Party 2010) that either party was thinking of major changes to wage supplements and social security policy more generally.. Within weeks, however, the coalition, drawing upon work by the conservative think tank the Ce

四目在模仿

Minimum and Living Wages: Alternatives to Wage Supplements?,ne a different means — regulating wages — of increasing the incomes of households where at least one person is in wage work. As has been demonstrated in the preceding chapters the issue of low wages, and particularly their perceived economic consequences, are not new to late modern times. However, t