Titlebook: Seemings and Epistemic Justification; How Appearances Just Luca Moretti Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature

Awkward

書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification被引頻次




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification年度引用




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification讀者反饋




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Harpoon

Concluding Remarks,t that phenomenal conservatism could provide a more satisfactory account of everyday epistemic practices and a more robust response to the sceptic if it were integrated with a theory of inferential justification. I also identify questions and issues relevant to the assessment of phenomenal conservatism to be investigated in further research.

改進

expire

Living-Will

The Bayesian Objection,e with Bayesianism. I consider a few responses and dismiss them as misled or problematic. Then, I argue that the objection doesn’t go through because it rests on an implausible formalization of the notion of seeming-based justification. In the final part of the chapter, I investigate how seeming-bas

obstinate

Antiscepticism and Easy Justification,can lose it simply by reflecting on her seemings. I argue that since seeming-based justification is elusive, the antisceptical bite of phenomenal conservatism is importantly limited. I also contend that since seeming-based justification has this feature, phenomenal conservatism isn’t actually afflic

Vldl379

Concluding Remarks,y serious problems attributed to it by its opponents, but that it neither possesses all the epistemic merits that its advocates think it has. I suggest that phenomenal conservatism could provide a more satisfactory account of everyday epistemic practices and a more robust response to the sceptic if

filicide

2211-4548 omenal conservatism by rejecting apparently consolidated obj.This book examines phenomenal conservatism, one of the most influential and promising internalist conceptions of non-inferential justification debated in current epistemology and philosophy of mind. It also explores the significance of the

指耕作

Acetabulum