找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Seemings and Epistemic Justification; How Appearances Just Luca Moretti Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature

[復制鏈接]
查看: 39096|回復: 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:27:36 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification
副標題How Appearances Just
編輯Luca Moretti
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/864/863788/863788.mp4
概述Focuses on phenomenal conservatism, one of the most influential and promising conceptions of epistemic justification.Sheds new light on phenomenal conservatism by rejecting apparently consolidated obj
叢書名稱SpringerBriefs in Philosophy
圖書封面Titlebook: Seemings and Epistemic Justification; How Appearances Just Luca Moretti Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature
描述.This book examines phenomenal conservatism, one of the most influential and promising internalist conceptions of non-inferential justification debated in current epistemology and philosophy of mind. It also explores the significance of the findings of this examination for the general debate on epistemic justification.?.According to phenomenal conservatism, non-inferential justification rests on seemings or appearances, conceived of as experiences provided with propositional content. Phenomenal conservatism states that if it appears to S that P, in the absence of defeaters, S thereby has some justification for believing that P. This view provides the basis for foundationalism and many ordinary epistemic practices..This book sheds new light on phenomenal conservatism by assessing objections to it and examining epistemological merits and advantages attributed to it. In a nutshell, phenomenal conservatism is actually compatible with Bayesian reasoning, and it is unaffected by bootstrapping problems and challenges that appeal to the cognitive penetrability of perception. Nevertheless, appearance-based justification proves unstable or elusive and its anti-septical bite is more limited t
出版日期Book 2020
關(guān)鍵詞Phenomenal Conservatism; Phenomenal Dogmatism; Non-Inferential Justification; Perceptual Justification;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43392-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-43391-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-43392-5Series ISSN 2211-4548 Series E-ISSN 2211-4556
issn_series 2211-4548
copyrightThe Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification被引頻次




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification年度引用




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification讀者反饋




書目名稱Seemings and Epistemic Justification讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:41:41 | 只看該作者
Concluding Remarks,t that phenomenal conservatism could provide a more satisfactory account of everyday epistemic practices and a more robust response to the sceptic if it were integrated with a theory of inferential justification. I also identify questions and issues relevant to the assessment of phenomenal conservatism to be investigated in further research.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:43:54 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:24:37 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:03:32 | 只看該作者
The Bayesian Objection,e with Bayesianism. I consider a few responses and dismiss them as misled or problematic. Then, I argue that the objection doesn’t go through because it rests on an implausible formalization of the notion of seeming-based justification. In the final part of the chapter, I investigate how seeming-bas
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:32:50 | 只看該作者
Antiscepticism and Easy Justification,can lose it simply by reflecting on her seemings. I argue that since seeming-based justification is elusive, the antisceptical bite of phenomenal conservatism is importantly limited. I also contend that since seeming-based justification has this feature, phenomenal conservatism isn’t actually afflic
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:23:53 | 只看該作者
Concluding Remarks,y serious problems attributed to it by its opponents, but that it neither possesses all the epistemic merits that its advocates think it has. I suggest that phenomenal conservatism could provide a more satisfactory account of everyday epistemic practices and a more robust response to the sceptic if
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:35:31 | 只看該作者
2211-4548 omenal conservatism by rejecting apparently consolidated obj.This book examines phenomenal conservatism, one of the most influential and promising internalist conceptions of non-inferential justification debated in current epistemology and philosophy of mind. It also explores the significance of the
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:31:09 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:31:10 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-25 06:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
松原市| 句容市| 宝应县| 济阳县| 信丰县| 石景山区| 木兰县| 石河子市| 和田市| 高雄县| 清新县| 房山区| 广德县| 元谋县| 丘北县| 禹州市| 板桥市| 凤山县| 化德县| 华阴市| 丰镇市| 株洲县| 弥渡县| 西藏| 宜兴市| 桐柏县| 上思县| 邻水| 宁远县| 宁乡县| 弋阳县| 蕲春县| 锦屏县| 察雅县| 贡山| 九龙城区| 成武县| 会同县| 清远市| 荣成市| 栖霞市|