Titlebook: Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn; Shaun May Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2015 Practice

Jejunum

書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn被引頻次




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn年度引用




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn讀者反饋




書目名稱Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

男生如果明白

脫離

Enrage

預(yù)兆好

Thymus

Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn

拍下盜公款

Enzyme

Conclusion,ing our inferences following it. This concluding chapter outlines some of the claims made throughout the book, briefly drawing out some of the implications of the views that haven’t yet been made explicit, before returning to the connections between practice as research and the cognitive turn.

BROW

Introduction,s research’ (PaR) and how the project of this book relates to the existing literature in the field. It also discusses the methodology of this book—what we might call, following Wittgenstein, ‘conceptual clarification’—and David Saltzs suggestion that performance theory needs philosophy.

DAMP

Rethinking the Cognitive Turn,r, who first suggested falsifiability as a criterion for differentiating scientific from non-scientific theories, before considering the extent to which Fauconnier and Turner’s work constitutes a falsifiable theory. Crucially, May suggests that most empirical hypotheses have a logical aspect to whic