Titlebook: Remaking Kurosawa; Translations and Per D. P. Martinez Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2009 anthropology.ci

輕佻

書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa被引頻次




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa年度引用




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa讀者反饋




書目名稱Remaking Kurosawa讀者反饋學科排名

微塵

殺蟲劑

Conclusion Thinking with Films,ng from one language, as well as cultural and historical contexts, to another. Translations and perceptions of relat-edness become conceptual bridges leading to something new, while retaining the old.

TEN

inhumane

有法律效應

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621671anthropology; cinema; film; Japan; subject; television; translation; truth

Esalate

花費

Overview: Through the lens of Akira Kurosawa‘s films, Martinez dissects the human tendency to make connections in a pioneering attempt to build a bridge out of diverse materials: the anthropology of Japan, film studies, and postmodern theory.978-0-230-62167-1

inchoate

Setting the Scene, that one of the best examples of this was the way in which the films of Akira Kurosawa had influenced non-Japanese filmmakers. As an anthropologist, I soon realized that such a simple thesis required discussion of a much more complex series of conceptual issues. First, copying in the eras of modern

腫塊

Portrait of an Artist as Filmmaker,w of his “young” life and Galbraith’s massive The Emperor and the Wolf (2001) fills in many gaps; for summaries of all his films and excellent analyses of his work, Richie’s work is also important (1987, 1996). His daughter Kurosawa Kazuko (2004a, 2004b) has recently offered two memoirs of life with