Titlebook: Ordinary Relationships; A Sociological Study Julie Brownlie Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 S

輕舟

書目名稱Ordinary Relationships影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships被引頻次




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships年度引用




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships讀者反饋




書目名稱Ordinary Relationships讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

dry-eye

獸皮

Living in the Second World . talking, through investigating our beliefs and practices about privacy, is an exercise which involves engaging with the related concepts of ‘the public’, the ‘personal’ (Mills, 1959) and ‘secrecy’ (Smart, 2011).

貴族

Presbyopia

Introduction: The Death of Ordinary Relationships?ent of ordinary relationships’ (1979, p.184). For Williams, ‘the principle that you can only be brought through emotional crisis by a professional’ is an ‘extraordinary characteristic notion of bourgeois-bureaucratic society’. The potential of ‘ordinary relationships’ is much debated in the current

香料

刺耳

About Distances: Researching Emotional Liveshe dialogue, to where, as he saw it, the author stopped getting in the way and the action began. As he got older, he became more interested in the things which ‘register and weigh’ (Miller, 2010, p.viii) — place, objects, memories, the mood of the moment, dimensions he felt he could best capture thr

慎重

SPURN

Look Who’s Listeninghere is a clamour to be heard, to narrate and gain attention’. Within the social sciences, though, the focus has been on talk without, curiously, much interest in who is doing the .. Most of the discussion in the last chapter focused on our general orientations towards emotions talk, that is, on our

嗎啡

The Practice of Being There, doing, reflexivity, privacy and vulnerability. This chapter begins by looking at what relationships that ‘matter’ look and feel like and teasing out what we mean when we say others are ‘there’ for us. To draw on Goffman’s (1974) question, I am interested in . when we are ‘there’ for others in the