Titlebook: Oral History and Digital Humanities; Voice, Access, and E Douglas A. Boyd (currently serves as the director Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan,

政府

Notes from the Field: Digital History and Oral History historical practices, expanding our capabilities to reach potentially vast audiences and to create innovative compositional works that meld visual, aural, and textual narratives into digital forms that can engage both scholars and the general public in discourse. The technological revolution has tr

FECK

承認(rèn)

果核

Swimming in the Exaflood: Oral History as Information in the Digital Ageave revolutionized countless aspects of the work of oral history—from creation, to preservation, to use—and raised a multitude of discussions among oral historians on the impact of new technologies on oral history practice. What is also needed is a discourse on the nature of oral history in the mids

enumaerate

[o] ral [h] istory and the [d]igital [h]umanitiesuld begin with a definition of the Digital Humanities (DH for short). Fortunately, digital humanists have a mania for defining the Digital Humanities, almost an obsessive compulsion. A bit of googling for variations of the phrase, “defining the digital humanities” turns up thousands of websites and

Thyroxine

Oral History in the Age of Digital Possibilitiesfirst actual developer was Dan Grahek, and his work was premiered at the 1991 meeting of the Oral History Association (OHA) in Salt Lake City. A dinosaur by today’s standards, that standalone station may have been the first time a digital presentation was given at OHA.

Biguanides

空洞

Swimming in the Exaflood: Oral History as Information in the Digital Aget must be dealt with is the nature of information itself: “What is the MEANING of information and its PURPOSE?” . For this conversation, I would argue that oral historians need to follow the same path. It has been important to examine the technological aspect of this revolution, but what about the m

Definitive

tinuum“. Heutige Psychologen wie W. Metzger sagen, da? der Raum ein leeres und totes Nichts ist, und da? er erst entsteht, wenn Orte in ihm festgelegt würden und Bezugssysteme ihn ausfüllten. ?hnlich definieren heutige Physiker seine Existenz als dasjenige, das durch Bezugs-?Felder“ impliziert wurde

Cholagogue

William Schneidertinuum“. Heutige Psychologen wie W. Metzger sagen, da? der Raum ein leeres und totes Nichts ist, und da? er erst entsteht, wenn Orte in ihm festgelegt würden und Bezugssysteme ihn ausfüllten. ?hnlich definieren heutige Physiker seine Existenz als dasjenige, das durch Bezugs-?Felder“ impliziert wurde