Titlebook: On the Content and Object of Presentations; A Psychological Inve Kasimir Twardowski Book 1977 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1977

Ornithologist

The Material Constituents of the Object,the first mentioned kind of parts is customarily called the . [.] of which the whole consists, while the totality of the constituents of the second kind is called the . [Form] of the whole. We distinguish, accordingly, for every complex between its material and its formal constituents..

額外的事

The Objects of General Presentations,everal objects belong to a general concept and that, therefore, the content of a presentation cannot be identified with its object.. We must now explain the reason why we have said that it is inadmissible to rely on this argument of Kerry’s.

服從

,The “Presented”,sentation and what sense it has when it is applied to the content of a presentation. This difference in meaning appears if we recall the relationship between attributive or determining adjectives on the one hand and modifying adjectives on the other..

climax

The Difference between Content and Object,ntent and object, but only a logical one; that in this case content and object are really one; and that this one entity appears sometimes as content, sometimes as object, because of the two points of view from which one can look at it.

表示問

,The Ambiguity of the Term ‘Characteristic’,here exists, as a result of that misleading terminology, a twofold use of the word ‘characteristic’ which is applied at times to the intentional object, hence to the content, at other times to the object.

令人不快

flex336

7樓

出生

7樓

separate

8樓

Mumble

8樓