Titlebook: On the Content and Object of Presentations; A Psychological Inve Kasimir Twardowski Book 1977 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1977

CRATE

外觀

978-90-247-1926-6Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1977

不易燃

Melbourne International Philosophy Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/o/image/701136.jpg

裂口

Act, Content, and Object of the Judgment,It appears likely that judgments are similar to presentations in regard to the distinction between content and object. If it is possible to discover a difference also between the content and the object of the mental phenomenon called judgment, then this should help to clarify the analogous relationship for presentations.

Licentious

opportune

acolyte

Act, Content, and Object of the Presentation,e of such a relation is a characteristic feature of mental phenomena which are by means of it distinguished from the physical phenomena. There always corresponds to the mental phenomena of being presented with something, of judging, of desiring, and of detesting something presented, something judged

Graves’-disease

Tortuous

,The “Presented”,makes a precise distinction between content and object more difficult. We have said already that the content and the object of a presentation are not in the same sense “something presented.” We shall now try to determine what the expression ‘presented’ means when it is applied to the object of a pre

Nefarious

,So-Called “Objectless” Presentations,e must distinguish, not only the content from the act, but also from these entities a third one, namely, the object. Now, there is the obvious objection to this view that there are “objectless” presentations; presentations, to which there correspond no objects. If so, then our previous consideration