Titlebook: Negation, Critical Theory, and Postmodern Textuality; Daniel Fischlin Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 English.Jac

visceral-fat

分解

未開(kāi)化

Matrimony

“My Real Smash”: Elenctic Negation in Henry James’s ,ted by philosophers with reference to strategies of discursive analysis.1 Thus, its relevance to literary study has not been appreciated, despite the concept’s application to issues in negation theory. Budick and Iser speak of “the wide-ranging adaptability of negativity, which can function equally

善于騙人

certitude

enlist

The Shadow Life: Negation, Nihilism, and Insanity in Thomas Bernhard’s ,ly demonstrating another, that of negation as the mainspring of creative processes. The first form of negation is mathematical, grammatical: it signifies an act that destroys or reverses the sign of its object. It has the apparent simplicity of a negative prefix (in-, dis-, non- or the minus sign),

Admire

Asseverate

Forster’s Ghosts: , and the Emptying of Narrative that doesn’t track these negations in their doubling and undoing of meaning.. They are the textual trace of the caves, offering and withholding narrative possibilities, emptying out the narrative confabulations, as the caves themselves “confabulated in pairs” (. 146),. telling a tale in a language

fatty-streak