Titlebook: Malignant Melanoma 1; John J. Costanzi (Professor of Medicine) Book 1983 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1983 Staging.adjuvant ther

影響深遠(yuǎn)

Larry Nathansoncharacter Azaro might call a “homecoming” (. 28). Pietro Deandrea suggests, further, that the “Nigerian urban ghetto” in which . is set is based on Lagos, the city where Okri spent his youth (48). However, the narrative tunnels backward in time not only toward Okri’s own beginnings (he was born in 1

PLAYS

Prapand Apisarnthanarax,Edgar B. Smithm which the Iranian government has distanced itself, but which is also periodically “renewed” by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, confirms the incendiary, religious sense in which this novel is irreverent. But as my discussion of Jorge Luis Borges makes clear, there are other senses in which irrever

躺下殘殺

Byron J. Baileyative traditions. As Derek Wright puts it: what are the appropriate “exegetic latitudes” by which to navigate through a reading of this difficult novel (“Interpreting” 18)? On a survey of the criticism that has appeared on Okri, three options have presented themselves: . has been read as heir to a t

TATE

Charles M. Balch,Seng-Jaw Soongl. Shelley’s text, widely read as her second-best literary effort (next to her 1818 novel, .), launches the genre and establishes many of its recognizable tropes. McCarthy’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel restages these tropes in the most recognizable contemporary inquiry into the crisis of lastness.

暖昧關(guān)系

Ronald T. Acton,Charles M. Balch,Bruce O. Barger,Bruce Budowle,Rodney C. P. Go,Seng-Jaw Soong,Jeffrel. Shelley’s text, widely read as her second-best literary effort (next to her 1818 novel, .), launches the genre and establishes many of its recognizable tropes. McCarthy’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel restages these tropes in the most recognizable contemporary inquiry into the crisis of lastness.

整體

S. C. Barrancotreasure was found and the fisc, is as ancient as it is difficult. The parable of the treasure hidden in a field (Matthew 13:44) hinted at that problem: the man who had found the treasure in the field buried it again and bought the field. Evidently, the Bible assumed that only the owner of the land