Titlebook: Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking; Micha? Araszkiewicz,Krzysztof P?eszka Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

原諒

Formalising Debates About Law-Making Proposals as Practical Reasoningopinion of a legal scholar on a Dutch legislative proposal and a US common-law judicial decision on whether an existing common law rule should be followed or distinguished. Both debates are formalised as practical reasoning, with versions of the argument schemes from good and bad consequences. These

GOUGE

Logics for Legal Dynamicshoroughly examined, the formalisation of legal dynamics has been mostly neglected. In this contribution we propose Temporal Defeasible Logic to model legal dynamics. We build such a logic in steps starting from basic defeasible logic, and we show how to use it to model different forms of modificatio

顯赫的人

Representing the Logic of Statutory Rules in the United Statestes. The chapter uses default logic and “rule trees” to reflect the dynamic and pragmatic context in which legal rules are used, as well as the interplay among legal rules, policy objectives and evidence. Rule trees also capture such important sub–structures as relevant–factor rules and legal presum

從容

POWER

Crayon

obviate

Logic Oriented Methods for Structuring in the Context of Lawmakingwording of a valid legal text is fixed. The sole variation of a legal text is its interpretation. At a decision-making point in a legislative process the interpretation is basically open. However, it can be pushed in a certain direction with the help of additional materials, such as parliamentary re

博愛家

偽書

hankering

Micha? Araszkiewicz,Krzysztof P?eszkaung des Fr?sers zum Planrad wurde in Abschnitt 2.33, Seite 14 beschrieben. Der den Fr?ser . tragende Fraskopf ., Bild 91, ist so auf der Planscheibe . der Maschine angebracht, da? er zwecks Einstellung der sog. Maschinendistanz . exzentrisch zur Planscheibemnitte . eingestellt werden kann. Diese Ein