Titlebook: Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking; Micha? Araszkiewicz,Krzysztof P?eszka Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

arouse

書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking被引頻次




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking年度引用




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking讀者反饋




書目名稱Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Insul島

Recessive

apiary

Conservative Coherentist Closure of Legal Systemsarify a concept of coherence in law, which is faithful to a theory of legal validity as source based law. Source based law is taken here as the “evidential base” for the reconstruction of the normative system, therefore guiding both interpretation and legislation activities even when implicit legisl

約會(huì)

胰臟

Open Texture in Law, Legal Certainty and Logical Analysis of Natural Languagehat is literally prescribed by a legal rule and what goal had the legislator in mind when enacting it. First, we describe this dilemma in detail. We use Hart’s example of a rule prohibiting vehicles from entering the park to show how the dilemma could pass to a decision maker if it is not sufficient

obstinate

The Theories of Statutory Construction and Legislative Process in American Jurisprudence use to find the meaning of statutory language and the theories of interpretation American judges use when approaching an interpretation question. While at first glance this chapter may seem to be one designed for academics and theorists who argue about which theory is best, it is also designed for

nettle

含糊

ABYSS

The Concept of Normative Consequence and Legislative Discourseso-called normative consequences of the former norms. The concept of ‘normative consequence’ is to a significant extent independent of the concept of logical consequence because some, if not most, legal inference schemes are non-deductive; moreover, some valid logical inference patterns are perceive