Titlebook: Kant and Spinozism; Transcendental Ideal Beth Lord Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2011 Immanuel K

止痛藥

voluble

Leisureliness

2947-5228 mmanence. Examining Jacobi, Herder, Maimon and Deleuze, Lord argues that Spinozism is central to the development of Kant‘s thought, and opens new avenues for understanding Kant‘s relation to Deleuze.978-1-349-36279-0978-0-230-29772-2Series ISSN 2947-5228 Series E-ISSN 2947-5236

驚奇

Against Spinozistic Dogmatism,f misconceptions that the transcendental idealism of the 1781 . was either a kind of metaphysical realism or a kind of empirical idealism, Kant began to see Spinozism as . dogmatic system to which he needed to demonstrate his opposition.

天文臺(tái)

Maimon and Spinozistic Idealism,found way. Both Solomon Maimon and Gilles Deleuze argue that Kant needs a concept of immanent genesis, not to address specific problems in ontology, epistemology, or philosophy of nature, but to make transcendental idealism what it should be: an exercise that is properly transcendental and appropriately idealistic.

Buttress

JADED

,Spinozism in the Ether: Kant’s Opus Postumum,scendental idealism as compatible with Spinozism, or with a materialist or idealist variant of it? Did the development of the concept of ether make him re-evaluate his attitude towards Spinoza? Does Kant truly move to a theory of the immanent production of empirical objects from a single substance?

Interferons

Herder and Spinozistic Naturalism,te modes becomes organic and dynamic for Herder, and Spinoza’s God is now cast as intelligent, wise, and providential. Kant, seeking an explanatory principle for natural diversity in his own philosophy of organic nature, saw that he had to repudiate Herder’s Spinozistic naturalism and his attempt to reconcile it with teleology.

happiness

細(xì)微差別