Titlebook: Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On; William J. Devlin,Alisa Bokulich Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Swi

擁擠前

enlist

FIS

decode

endure

,The Evolving Notion and Role of Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis,tatements in antiquated scientific texts. The philosophy of science community was critical of the thesis, arguing it made science both irrational and relativistic. In response, Kuhn proposed several versions of the incommensurability thesis to clarify and defend it. He also shifted from a historical

細(xì)查

ESO

osculate

,Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science,ve legacy to the philosophy of science. I begin by recounting Kuhn’s relationship to the sociology of science. First, I examine the influence of sociology of science on .. Surprisingly, sociology of science had very little influence on Kuhn as he wrote .. Second, I examine early responses to Kuhn’s

美學(xué)

,Kuhn’s Development Before and After ,,ultimate draft of . to its final version. Here, I examine the notable absence of Wittgenstein’s influence and the distinction between the context of discovery and the context of justification in the penultimate draft. Next, I turn to his unfinished book manuscript entitled .. I explore Kuhn’s develo

挫敗

r example, the air permeability of grain stored in a grain bin will help engineers to determine how much air pressure will be needed to make air flow through the grain at a required flow rate in designing a grain drying process. Similarly, the hydraulic permeability of a granular or powdered materia