Titlebook: Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On; William J. Devlin,Alisa Bokulich Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Swi

Jejunum

書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On被引頻次




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On年度引用




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On讀者反饋




書目名稱Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

strdulate

William J. Devlin,Alisa BokulichCommemorates the 50th anniversary of Kuhn’s publication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Explores Kuhn’s philosophical development after Structure, in light of his original arguments.Examine

威脅你

Narcissist

假設(shè)

978-3-319-37720-9Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

cravat

Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On978-3-319-13383-6Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942

jabber

古文字學(xué)

,Kuhn’s ,: A Moment in Modern Naturalism,tting aside the celebration of science and– despite its skepticism about the place in science of Reason, Method, Truth, and Progress—any note of criticism as well. The naturalistic impulse to describe, interpret, and explain, rather than to evaluate and justify, was not a notable feature of commenta

羽毛長成

脆弱吧

From Troubled Marriage to Uneasy Colocation: Thomas Kuhn, Epistemological Revolutions, Romantic Narhistory and philosophy of science. It begins with a statement of the current high entropy state of history and philosophy of science in order to ask a few questions of how, in the wake of Kuhn’s work and in Kuhn’s work itself the relations between history and philosophy of science were conceived. In