Titlebook: Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing; Erica Burleigh Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014 America

熱情美女

書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing被引頻次




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing年度引用




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing讀者反饋




書目名稱Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

CAMP

勤勉

Range-Of-Motion

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137404084America; bibliography; genre; interdependence; landscape; love; novel; oral discourse; slavery; William Henry

約會

Inordinate

ow the trope of the family recurred to produce contradictory images - both intimately familiar and frighteningly alienating - through which Americans responded to upheavals in their cultural landscape.978-1-349-48718-9978-1-137-40408-4

BOOM

Introduction: Intimacy, Integrity, Interdependence,too much family feeling: incest recurs as both an implicit and an explicit element of many early American writings, from the satirical . (1787) to Charles Brockden Brown’s Gothic . (1798) to William Hill Brown’s sentimental . (1807) to Rowson’s equally florid sequel, . (1828).

階層

Discursive Intimacy,ry. Understanding how noninstrumental (or not primarily instrumental) relationships were figured makes clear the ways in which later eighteenth-century American writers both repudiated and repurposed different languages of union.

面包屑

Introduction: Intimacy, Integrity, Interdependence,orn or die around the same time that their mothers (themselves usually seduced, unwed, and abandoned) expire. This macabre narrative consistency—found in texts like Susanna Rowson’s . (1791), Hannah Webster Foster’s . (1797), and P. D. Manvil’s . (1807)—might indicate that early American writers wer

Visual-Field

Discursive Intimacy,y seem (to put it charitably) counterintuitive. Without this background, however, the discussion that follows would be missing a crucial antecedent: how people thought about relationships between people that were not familial—nor national, nor economic, nor political, nor even necessarily emotionall