Titlebook: Interpreting Clifford Geertz; Cultural Investigati Jeffrey C. Alexander,Philip Smith,Matthew Norton Book 2011 Jeffrey C. Alexander, Philip

殘暴

Clifford Geertz and the Strong Program: The Human Sciences and Cultural Sociologygure. Interpreting is a way of positioning, of saying who we are, in relationship to an intellectual icon, placing ourselves alongside him, against him, or somewhere in between. Lack of agreement, not only about propositions but also about presuppositions, is the reality of intellectual life in the human sciences.

Herbivorous

2946-3572 s a theorist rather than as an anthropologist. To date there has been no impartial, comprehensive, and authoritative work published on this critical figure.??978-0-230-11172-1978-0-230-11898-0Series ISSN 2946-3572 Series E-ISSN 2946-3580

Abominate

Semiotics and Thick Description (Barthes and Geertz) a text to show how it all worked, and, more than that, what its workings told you about clockworks overall, what they could do and could not do, and, by extension, how those clockworks were part not only of literary schemata but also of our very toolkits for understanding our places in time and history.

MOCK

“Malarial and Diffident”: The Vision of Clifford Geertze diffident—but there is clearly something more to the appearance and combination of these adjectives. There is something that merits a pause and a second look at the adjectives and the introduction in which they appear.

運(yùn)動(dòng)的我

Ritual, Power, and Style: The Implications of , For the Sociology of Power comparison between Negara’s formalism and Western naturalism is, of course, very elliptical; it needs more detailing. This attempt to generalize Geertz’s model of the Balinese theater state risks engendering a similar criticism as . did in the years subsequent to its publication.”

繁重

itinerary

The Balinese Cockfight Decoded: Reflections on Geertz and Structuralismor, put another way, fought through and fought over. Here I undertake this task via a particular strategy, looking at his output not in the aggregate but in miniature. I suggest that we might leverage some wider insights by first paying close and critical attention to Geertz’s single greatest master

Prophylaxis

Ascendancy

Thick Description, Thin History: Did Historians Always Understand Clifford Geertz?f their somewhat sardonic flavor.. Inevitably and quite legitimately, the concepts and vocabularies of theorists in other subject areas do work themselves into the practice and writing of history without historians always having to pay attention to exactly where or how they originate. Nevertheless,

上下連貫

Scientific Cultureswith the Green Lion. And yet, despite all these displacements, substitutions, and buryings, the concept of force guided physics like a sextant across the sea changes of the discipline. Force was there in classical gravitation and mechanics, electrostatics, and electrodynamics; it was still present i