Titlebook: Interpreting Clifford Geertz; Cultural Investigati Jeffrey C. Alexander,Philip Smith,Matthew Norton Book 2011 Jeffrey C. Alexander, Philip

DEAF

Semiotics and Thick Description (Barthes and Geertz)s, “sciences of man” sort—work coming out of structuralism and the poststructuralism that, in the United States, came so closely on its heels. Cliff Geertz was part of the group. When it came my turn to lead a discussion—on Faulkner’s novel .—I was somewhat surprised and taken aback by Geertz’s resi

Alcove

The Balinese Cockfight Decoded: Reflections on Geertz and Structuralismefine a mission, and generate profitable intellectual strategies. At its best such a pilgrimage does more than simply worship slavishly at the altar of the totemic ancestor. Rather there will be an effort to reconfigure a legacy to fit present needs and to generate critical readings that have the so

不愛防注射

On Not Doing Systemsn asked Geertz about this statement in light of his influential articles on cultural “systems” of religion, ideology, common sense, and so on. Geertz replied that his recurring use of the term could be taken as evidence of Talcott Parsons’ durable influence on him during his graduate work at Harvard

出汗

執(zhí)

Maximal Interpretation in Clifford Geertz and the Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Toward a Newof society and history or whether culture constitutes a world unto itself whose study necessarily eschews explanation and invites or even demands interpretation instead. The strong program in cultural sociology is but one example of a mode of research and research in the human sciences that has forc

材料等

Oversee

“Malarial and Diffident”: The Vision of Clifford Geertzin this edited volume celebrating Geertz. But it is the opening sentence of the first section (“The Raid”) of the essay that, more than any other aspect of its rich social and cultural exegesis, has stayed with me over the years: “Early in April of 1958, my wife and I arrived, malarial and diffident

喪失

Thick Description, Thin History: Did Historians Always Understand Clifford Geertz?red.” He noted the delayed impact of the ideas of, among others, Marx, Durkheim, Freud, Kuhn, Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu, and Clifford Geertz. “This is unsurprising,” he wrote, “for what happens in one generation in economics, psychology, sociology, philosophy, or anthropology will usually be refl

UNT

recession

Geertz’S Legacy Beyond the Modes of Cultural Analysis of His Time: Speculative Notes and Queries in istracted from my main task of working on an ethnographic project to study the secretariat of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Geneva.. But in this, I do not feel far from Geertz: his influence on our (it is a collaboration) anticipations is undeniable. Will we be able to accumulate fieldwork c