Titlebook: Image Warfare in the War on Terror; Nathan Roger Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 communicati

STRI

書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror被引頻次




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror年度引用




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror讀者反饋




書目名稱Image Warfare in the War on Terror讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

padding

ironic

Conclusion,age warfare in the war on terror because they are still trapped in an outdated techno-war mindset, whereas al-Qaeda, in contrast, seemingly has a better understanding that images are indeed uncontrollable in an image warfare theatre of war.

詳細(xì)目錄

Introduction,is has on the conduct of conflict. I argue that a significant shift has occurred in the relationship between images and the media system which enables their circulation and identify this as a shift from a mass communication system to a rhizomatic communication system. This shift is driven by changes

Commission

團(tuán)結(jié)

創(chuàng)造性

Suicides,tegy. Suicide terrorism might seem an unlikely form of image munition since it is too obviously a physical-force tactic employed by terrorists to gain a military advantage. However, suicide terrorism also contains a powerful symbolic dimension which is exploited by terrorists to manufacture propagan

moribund

Executions,related though distinctive terrorist tactics (hijackings, hostage-takings and hostage executions) which are each symbolically powerful and as such are the source of a number of powerful image munitions. Attention then shifts to discuss the hunt for Uday, Qusay and Saddam Hussein. In turning these in

宣傳

Bouquet

Conclusion,nected to a twentieth-century notion of propaganda, characterized by control and the ‘mobilization of images’) to a rhizomatic media system (connected to the deterritorialized circulation and the ‘weaponization of images’). I have also argued that this has resulted in a paradigm shift from techno-wa