Titlebook: Handbook for the Historiography of Science; Mauro L. Condé,Marlon Salomon Reference work 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Historio

Agronomy

The Social Context of Health and Health Workere errors of the theoreticians fruitful and that (b) the author embraces a teleological, almost determinist conception of historical evolution as being governed by laws that make predictions of the future of theories possible. Lastly, based on the preceding considerations, the intention is to draft

護(hù)身符

Flirtatious

大暴雨

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42727-0on Bernal’s writings and on Bernal’s and Needham’s papers at the University of Cambridge, this chapter aims to assess Bernal’s historiographical approach in the light of the development of British scientific policy between the 1930s and the 1960s and of the debate on Marxism and history in Britain.

fastness

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23062-4till to be achieved. In other words, Kuhn’s influence will be complete when the historiography of science deepens his guidelines for effective writing of the history of science, namely, a theory of the history of science that articulates (1) the historical and social aspects, (2) the idea of evoluti

BUOY

The Social Dynamics of George H. Meadt the background of Popper’s groundbreaking works in the philosophy of science. And it calls attention to what is possibly Agassi’s most relevant contribution to the historiography of science: regarding the history of metaphysics as integral to the history of scientific research, Agassi celebrates t

字謎游戲

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3e exemplary case of the experimental philosophy of the English seventeenth century in order to show the way in which Shapin links the logic of finitism with the preconditions of knowledge in his approach to a fundamental theme in his work: the boundaries of scientific practice.

內(nèi)向者

含水層

我的巨大

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73464-9he notion of truth. To speak of a “French school” of philosophy of science would undoubtedly put too much emphasis on an institutional approach, even if the importance of the . is undeniable. To speak of a French tradition would underestimate the obvious differences between the authors and would lea