Titlebook: Handbook for the Historiography of Science; Mauro L. Condé,Marlon Salomon Reference work 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Historio

輕觸

2523-7748 nd traditions that have established the writing of the history of science.?.This book can be conceived as a reference work not only for professional historians and philosophers but also for academics from diffe978-3-031-27510-4Series ISSN 2523-7748 Series E-ISSN 2523-7756

伸展

CEDE

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514119of science possible and general conditions concerning the intellectual context of the day and more specific ones regarding the Russian born French historian’s intellectual trajectory must be considered..The first works on the history of science that Alexandre Koyré wrote and published date back to t

commute

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30792-8 importance lies principally in the novel perspective of his epistemology which, given its eminently philosophical stance in the face of the profound transformations in the sciences (particularly physics, chemistry, and mathematics) that marked the early decades of the twentieth century, has become

性行為放縱者

The Social Determinants of Health in Indiaattention away from its standard objects like physics and astronomy and reoriented toward the life sciences. But what exactly is a historical epistemology of the life sciences? In recent years, it seems to mean (with Rheinberger) a historicized reflection on concept construction in, e.g., molecular

antiandrogen

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005519thought collective. We aim to demonstrate that, besides introducing the idea that social and historical factors condition scientific knowledge, Fleck was also a pioneer in conceiving biology as a model for epistemology. Unfortunately, the Kuhnian reading of Fleck’s work emphasized this social approa

占卜者

胖人手藝好

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23062-4work and discusses his important contribution to the historiography of science. The first part analyzes his masterpiece, .. Next, Kuhn’s debate with Karl Popper’s philosophy of science in the 1960s is interpreted as a crucial confrontation between two traditions of research on science established ar

Mitigate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13909-6ent one of the nerve centers of Bourdieusian reflections. In the thought of this author, the theme of science has been both an object of socio-historical investigation and a cardinal problem of epistemological reflection – a way to justify the validity of sociological research in itself (the problem

Amendment