Titlebook: Gilles Deleuze and Film Criticism; Philosophy, Theory, Dominic Lash,Hoi Lun Law Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

打算

Deleuze and the Film in His Mindmarks on Robert Bresson’s . (France, 1959). The chapter tests the terms and phrases that Deleuze uses to characterise the film. This testing highlights the stresses and strains in his articulations and specifications showing how they may significantly affect an understanding of text and film.

floodgate

Gilles Deleuze and the Company of Critics: On Kubrick, Time, and Cinemaference to Annette Michelson, focusing on her writings on Soviet cinema, both writers devote significant attention to the work of Stanley Kubrick, especially . (1969), seeing in that film a model of mental activity and the relation between mind and body. I argue that their treatments of the film’s a

certitude

“Very Slight Differences”: Deleuze and the Aesthetics of Cinematic Motionrgued that he devalues the specific movements of bodies and objects on screen. In order to investigate this tension between the philosophical and aesthetic dimensions of his stance on cinematic motion, the chapter examines what Deleuze calls “indices of equivocity” in the films of Harold Lloyd, Char

Inordinate

配偶

Banish All the World: Deleuze on rger embodied modern cinema’s capacity for expressing what Deleuze called the ‘powers of the false’. From Citizen Kane to Touch of Evil, Orson Welles evolved this figure to encapsulate the exhaustion, nihilism, and ultimately (self-)destructive drive of modern life. However, against this dominant im

ASSET

Donen and Minnelli: An Exchange of Energiesanley Donen and Vincente Minnelli giving birth to and outlining a dream image.?In Donen, we find a world of “flat views” out of which dance emerges.?With Minnelli, on the other hand, the flat view is replaced by a “plurality of worlds” confronting and absorbing one another and in which we find a “br

雜役

intuition

調(diào)整校對(duì)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91038-8f individual films, considered more broadly. It then briefly contextualises the approach taken by this book within the relevant scholarship (although it is necessarily selective, given the huge extent of the literature), before briefly introducing the specific contents of the volume.

耐寒