Titlebook: Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700; David Wootton (Anniversary Professor of History),G Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a

出租車

書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700被引頻次




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700年度引用




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700讀者反饋




書目名稱Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500-1700讀者反饋學科排名

不朽中國

bioavailability

按時間順序

熒光

FEAS

FEAS

Unknown Shrews: Three Transformations of ,ion between theatrical cultures has been systematically downplayed, a tendency which is perhaps best illustrated by the depreciating term ‘strolling player’ itself. Scholars who have painstakingly reconstructed the players’ routes and the repertoire that was brought from London to various cities and

放逐

,‘Ye sid ha taken my Counsel sir’: Restoration Satire and Theatrical Authority,title of the poem recalls the events surrounding the monarch’s discovery of another satire — Wilmot’s infamous, vulgar ‘On King Charles,’ which led to Rochester’s banishment when, in a state of drunken confusion, he showed it to the king. Despite the fact that . attributes the ‘Satyr’ to Rochester,

Atrium

,‘Darkenes was before light’: Hierarchy and Duality in ,, Kate’s final speech of submission. In ., the speech is an essay on order, hierarchy and subjection reminiscent of the 1570 ... In . the speech has nothing to say about the state, the commonwealth, rulers and magistrates, the body politic. It is not political and contemporary, but visionary and the

CLASP