Titlebook: Evil and the God of Love; John Hick Book Dec 1985Latest edition Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1985 god.lo

隱語

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61073-8 purpose of this final chapter of Part II is to summarize the main features of the Augustinian type of theodicy, and then to ask concerning each of these features whether it should be carried over into our attempt in Part IV to confront the problem of evil directly, independently of the claims of tradition.

一大塊

Modellierung schulischer Notenbildung now have before us the two historical types of Christian theodicy. I shall summarize the main points of contrast between them, and then take notice of certain convergent tendencies, working for the most part beneath the surface, which qualify these contrasts and even suggest the possibility of a common future development. But first the contrasts:

博愛家

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16778-3 religious concept of sin covers the domains of two basic ethical ideas, those of wrong action and of bad moral character. It differs, however, from a combination of these purely ethical notions by setting them in a theological context and interpreting the human faults in question as expressions of a wrong relationship with God.

NATTY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25244-1 is a large physiological and medical literature dealing with the subject of pain, and what follows, representing a philosopher’s attempt to relate the scientific work in this field to the wider problem of evil, is based primarily on the works mentioned in the footnote.

Concomitant

The Problem and its Terms one were to construct a full descriptive title for this book, it might run as follows: A critical study of the two responses to the problem of evil that have been developed within Christian thought, and an attempt to formulate a theodicy for today.

SPECT

Dividing the Light from the Darkness purpose of this final chapter of Part II is to summarize the main features of the Augustinian type of theodicy, and then to ask concerning each of these features whether it should be carried over into our attempt in Part IV to confront the problem of evil directly, independently of the claims of tradition.

莎草

The Two Theodicies — Contrasts and Agreements now have before us the two historical types of Christian theodicy. I shall summarize the main points of contrast between them, and then take notice of certain convergent tendencies, working for the most part beneath the surface, which qualify these contrasts and even suggest the possibility of a common future development. But first the contrasts:

Arthr-

Moral Evil religious concept of sin covers the domains of two basic ethical ideas, those of wrong action and of bad moral character. It differs, however, from a combination of these purely ethical notions by setting them in a theological context and interpreting the human faults in question as expressions of a wrong relationship with God.

解脫

Pain is a large physiological and medical literature dealing with the subject of pain, and what follows, representing a philosopher’s attempt to relate the scientific work in this field to the wider problem of evil, is based primarily on the works mentioned in the footnote.

FAR