Titlebook: Expressions of War in Australia and the Pacific; Language, Trauma, Me Amanda Laugesen,Catherine Fisher Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicab

只有

舊病復(fù)發(fā)

,‘Testament of Youth’: Young Australians’ Responses to Anzac,connected to Anzac, there are those who do not feel a part of its story and who are not interested in engaging with its memory. By examining young Australians’ language, this chapter considers how new generations of Australians are responding to Anzac and how they are reshaping its histories and tra

單獨(dú)

假設(shè)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54592-9uction to the collection provides a brief survey of recent scholarship in the area of language and war, as well as the relevant fields of trauma studies and memory studies, with a particular focus on work concerned with twentieth- and twenty-first-century conflicts.

仔細(xì)檢查

sacrum

SEED

Specific Problems of Paediatric Radiologyontext for language to also influence the identities of affected individuals and the level of control they have to influence their mental wellbeing. Language can also reveal attitudes towards the allocation of responsibility for the causes and management of PTS, influencing help-seeking behaviours.

懦夫

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1516-6connected to Anzac, there are those who do not feel a part of its story and who are not interested in engaging with its memory. By examining young Australians’ language, this chapter considers how new generations of Australians are responding to Anzac and how they are reshaping its histories and tra

GROVE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52836-2 and . (1915–18). It first lists the vocabulary used in these periodicals to describe the German enemy and convey humour at their expense. It then examines which German words were incorporated into the everyday language of the soldiers. Finally, it considers the broader impact of humour in trench publications during the First World War.

帶傷害

An introduction to imaging radar,n studying language at war, and argues for the value of placing multi-disciplinary approaches to language and war in conversation with each other. It also considers where scholarship on language and war can go next.