Titlebook: Explanatory Translation; Beyond the Kuhnian M Veikko Rantala Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Prolog.argue.discours

Johnson

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Explanatory Translation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Arthr-

Examples and Applications of Local Translationanslation. Pragmatic and hermeneutic elements are crucial here, and they determine the logical structure of a translation. In the last section of this chapter, I try to indicate that the theory can be applied to visual art, too, if we accept the idea of pictorial utterances and speech acts and the i

等級(jí)的上升

Case Studiesll see that the answer is not quite evident, since the alleged informal correspondence relation seems to split into local relations. On the other hand, I study a structuralist logical reconstruction of the former theory, which might yield a possibility to define an exact correspondence relation. The

去才蔑視

Theories and Logicsvelopments in logic that generalize the whole notion of logic (or, rather, of . logic). Furthermore, I make a brief historical digression, in Section 3, to explore Rudolf Carnap’s anticipation, in the thirties, of what happened in logic and logical metascience somewhat later in the twentieth century

Gleason-score

0166-6991 ientific change and his views of language learning, but it can be used to go beyond Kuhn‘s well-known ideas and challenge his criticism concerning the import of the correspondence relation.978-90-481-6105-8978-94-017-1521-8Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

不可比擬

不可比擬

Surgeon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58060-4anslation. Pragmatic and hermeneutic elements are crucial here, and they determine the logical structure of a translation. In the last section of this chapter, I try to indicate that the theory can be applied to visual art, too, if we accept the idea of pictorial utterances and speech acts and the i

幾何學(xué)家

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-94528-1ll see that the answer is not quite evident, since the alleged informal correspondence relation seems to split into local relations. On the other hand, I study a structuralist logical reconstruction of the former theory, which might yield a possibility to define an exact correspondence relation. The

harbinger