Titlebook: Expertise and Decision Support; George Wright,Fergus Bolger Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992 Action.interaction.nat

sperse

Ejaculate

Siddhartha Chib,Yasuhiro Omori,Manabu Asaise is not atypical of many other judgment tasks. Finally, I will use what has gone before to broaden and clarify the contingency model of judgment and underscore its relevance to understanding and supporting judgmental expertise.

膽大

ONYM

劇毒

Brian J. Meacham,Margaret McNameeult (1970). Nor is the intention to explore all relevant theories with the aim of reaching some conclusive outcome on the nature of expertise. Rather, the objective is to suggest a way forward for developing a theoretical framework as a tool for understanding the nature of expertise as it is practiced. To this end, empirical data are presented.

landmark

Sociological Perspectives on the Nature of Expertiseult (1970). Nor is the intention to explore all relevant theories with the aim of reaching some conclusive outcome on the nature of expertise. Rather, the objective is to suggest a way forward for developing a theoretical framework as a tool for understanding the nature of expertise as it is practiced. To this end, empirical data are presented.

critic

厚顏無恥

偽善

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7450-0ges into a single estimate, while “behavioral” approaches allow the full interaction of group members until some form of consensus is achieved, and “mixed” type involves components of both these approaches.

野蠻

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7076-2nce that the mathematical aggregation of judgments from several individuals (collected as a “statistized,” “nominal,” or “noninteracting” group) usually would be better than the accuracy expected by randomly selecting a single individual from the population of all prospective group members (Bruce, 1935; Gordon, 1924; Knight, 1921).