Titlebook: Expertise and Decision Support; George Wright,Fergus Bolger Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992 Action.interaction.nat

Explosive

Handbook of Food Fortification and Healthumans are strong are generally those areas where experts systems are weak; so it seems appropriate to design cooperative systems recognizing this. Although expert systems and decision support systems have much in common, important differences between them mean that knowledge acquisition for DSS must be considered in its own right.

不能強(qiáng)迫我

付出

Perspectives on Expertise in the Aggregation of Judgmentsges into a single estimate, while “behavioral” approaches allow the full interaction of group members until some form of consensus is achieved, and “mixed” type involves components of both these approaches.

Bouquet

adhesive

Knowledge Engineering Issues for Decision Supportumans are strong are generally those areas where experts systems are weak; so it seems appropriate to design cooperative systems recognizing this. Although expert systems and decision support systems have much in common, important differences between them mean that knowledge acquisition for DSS must be considered in its own right.

使混合

不如屎殼郎

Improving Decisions and Judgments The Desirable versus the Feasible in such a process? In the first part of this chapter I will briefly address one of the more fundamental (and at the same time one of the most difficult) questions in decision sciences, namely, what constitutes a good or a poor decision and how could it be measured and assessed.

鐵塔等

Introductionrs—ever more complex technological and social developments. It seems that we must constantly defer to expert judgment in our everyday affairs, but our dependence on expert judgment is more obvious when things go wrong. For example, at this time there is much public concern in the United Kingdom abou

低三下四之人

人類學(xué)家