Titlebook: Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers; A Residential Worksh Godfrey T. Barrett-Lennard Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

Hallucination

書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers被引頻次




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers年度引用




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers讀者反饋




書目名稱Experiential Learning for Professional Helpers讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

機(jī)構(gòu)

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318776.jpg

真繁榮

978-3-319-83858-8The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

Ballad

Sabine Grenz,Beate Kortendiek,Andrea L?therd foreshadows the full scope of this volume. The starting initiative, aims, resources and residential arrangements for the workshop, and the process and content features these led on to, are concisely indicated. The chapter includes the widely circulated opening announcement, which specified that th

Mercantile

insidious

Juila Janfeshar Nobari,Paul-Alan Armstrong on to the late and ending sessions. The residential situation and late-night informal conversations meant that some people were weary at times, but with little effect on their interchange. The cognitive resources and fluency of members of this group meant that vigorous exchanges of ideas and viewpo

insidious

Petra Ahrens,Katja Chmilewski,Birgit Sauerprocess—as brought out in the member dialogues included in this chapter. The two groups were alike in member interests, both were strongly inquiring, hard-working and personally engaged, and the facilitator-leaders had much in common. Y group, by comparison, struggled much less than the X group, a v

誘導(dǎo)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18861-0. This chapter documents just how this was done and with what results. As soon as each session ended, each participant filled in a rating sheet before they left the meeting room. The exercise was intended to be intrinsically worthwhile, calling on each person’s reflective appraisal of aspects they m

Pert敏捷

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46798-1 after resuming their lives and work at home, giving feedback on their workshop experience and its aftermath. They were now looking back from a familiar reality to a clearly unusual or exceptional one that left considerable impact. Their own accounts, individual in scope and valence, provide unique

祖?zhèn)?/a>

Gender Expertise in Public Policyr in response both to broad open-ended questions and (following that) to a multiple choice questionnaire. The development of a classification system to identify effects from the low structure data is described. Four distinct and often-mentioned effects refer to aspects of experienced relational and