找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evictionism; The compromise solut Walter E. Block Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spr

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 40459|回復(fù): 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:59:57 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Evictionism
副標(biāo)題The compromise solut
編輯Walter E. Block
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317503/317503.mp4
概述A unique perspective to the pro-life, pro-choice debate.Explores themes of property rights in relation to human life and rights.Offers a balanced debate on the topic of human rights
圖書封面Titlebook: Evictionism; The compromise solut Walter E. Block Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spr
描述This book applies libertarian property rights theory to a vexing controversy, abortion. This book offers a compromise solution that will not fully please either of the two sides of this debate, but, is the only possible reconciliation between the two. Nor are its benefits limited to the fact that the opposing forces in this debate may be brought together. Evictionism, also, is the only philosophical position compatible with human rights; neither of the other two can make this claim..There are many other publications and learned articles supporting the pro-life position as well as?defending the pro-life viewpoint. This is the only book that offers a perspective on abortion that is radically different than both.?This book uniquely applies private property rights theories we all agree upon when referred to issues such as real estate, crime, torts, etc., to abortion. The underlying philosophical contribution of Evictionism this book presents is that these basic legal premises can be utilized in this controversial case as well as practically everywhere else in law..Want to solve the abortion controversy? Want to demonstrate that both the pro-life and the pro-choice positions are erroneo
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Evictionism; Libertarianism; Abortion; Private Property Rights; Children’s Rights; Property Abandonment; T
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5014-7
isbn_softcover978-981-16-5016-1
isbn_ebook978-981-16-5014-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapor
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Evictionism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evictionism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evictionism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evictionism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evictionism被引頻次




書目名稱Evictionism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evictionism年度引用




書目名稱Evictionism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evictionism讀者反饋




書目名稱Evictionism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:43:50 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:18:43 | 只看該作者
Rejoinder to Boonin on Abortion, of the fetus? If this is what is meant, we must say that at the present level of medical technology, this will spell the death knell of the infant during the first two trimesters of its life, but not during the third. If so, partial birth abortions in the last trimester would be banned. Or is abor
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:09:05 | 只看該作者
Yuan-Yi Chang,Ming-Feng Wu,Chih-Yu WenPaul on the “right” who is an ardent pro-lifer. Nor are these two gentlemen fringe members of this movement. Rothbard has been rightly characterized as “Mr. Libertarian” and Ron Paul’s libertarian credentials would be difficult to equal.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:37:49 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:28:11 | 只看該作者
Book 2021ase either of the two sides of this debate, but, is the only possible reconciliation between the two. Nor are its benefits limited to the fact that the opposing forces in this debate may be brought together. Evictionism, also, is the only philosophical position compatible with human rights; neither
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:33:22 | 只看該作者
IntroductionPaul on the “right” who is an ardent pro-lifer. Nor are these two gentlemen fringe members of this movement. Rothbard has been rightly characterized as “Mr. Libertarian” and Ron Paul’s libertarian credentials would be difficult to equal.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:05:41 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:30:49 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:15:34 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 00:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
珲春市| 嘉善县| 池州市| 定结县| 尼勒克县| 六盘水市| 延川县| 那曲县| 岳普湖县| 桑日县| 龙州县| 南投县| 丹凤县| 黔西| 武宣县| 新建县| 石柱| 湘潭县| 华池县| 汨罗市| 克什克腾旗| 双鸭山市| 易门县| 茂名市| 桐庐县| 保靖县| 桃园市| 鹤庆县| 新津县| 马公市| 桐城市| 治多县| 利辛县| 大港区| 永州市| 乐安县| 西昌市| 昌平区| 凌源市| 濮阳县| 开平市|