找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evictionism; The compromise solut Walter E. Block Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spr

[復制鏈接]
查看: 40464|回復: 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:59:57 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Evictionism
副標題The compromise solut
編輯Walter E. Block
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317503/317503.mp4
概述A unique perspective to the pro-life, pro-choice debate.Explores themes of property rights in relation to human life and rights.Offers a balanced debate on the topic of human rights
圖書封面Titlebook: Evictionism; The compromise solut Walter E. Block Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spr
描述This book applies libertarian property rights theory to a vexing controversy, abortion. This book offers a compromise solution that will not fully please either of the two sides of this debate, but, is the only possible reconciliation between the two. Nor are its benefits limited to the fact that the opposing forces in this debate may be brought together. Evictionism, also, is the only philosophical position compatible with human rights; neither of the other two can make this claim..There are many other publications and learned articles supporting the pro-life position as well as?defending the pro-life viewpoint. This is the only book that offers a perspective on abortion that is radically different than both.?This book uniquely applies private property rights theories we all agree upon when referred to issues such as real estate, crime, torts, etc., to abortion. The underlying philosophical contribution of Evictionism this book presents is that these basic legal premises can be utilized in this controversial case as well as practically everywhere else in law..Want to solve the abortion controversy? Want to demonstrate that both the pro-life and the pro-choice positions are erroneo
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Evictionism; Libertarianism; Abortion; Private Property Rights; Children’s Rights; Property Abandonment; T
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5014-7
isbn_softcover978-981-16-5016-1
isbn_ebook978-981-16-5014-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapor
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Evictionism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evictionism影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Evictionism網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Evictionism網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Evictionism被引頻次




書目名稱Evictionism被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Evictionism年度引用




書目名稱Evictionism年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Evictionism讀者反饋




書目名稱Evictionism讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:43:50 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:18:43 | 只看該作者
Rejoinder to Boonin on Abortion, of the fetus? If this is what is meant, we must say that at the present level of medical technology, this will spell the death knell of the infant during the first two trimesters of its life, but not during the third. If so, partial birth abortions in the last trimester would be banned. Or is abor
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:09:05 | 只看該作者
Yuan-Yi Chang,Ming-Feng Wu,Chih-Yu WenPaul on the “right” who is an ardent pro-lifer. Nor are these two gentlemen fringe members of this movement. Rothbard has been rightly characterized as “Mr. Libertarian” and Ron Paul’s libertarian credentials would be difficult to equal.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:37:49 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:28:11 | 只看該作者
Book 2021ase either of the two sides of this debate, but, is the only possible reconciliation between the two. Nor are its benefits limited to the fact that the opposing forces in this debate may be brought together. Evictionism, also, is the only philosophical position compatible with human rights; neither
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:33:22 | 只看該作者
IntroductionPaul on the “right” who is an ardent pro-lifer. Nor are these two gentlemen fringe members of this movement. Rothbard has been rightly characterized as “Mr. Libertarian” and Ron Paul’s libertarian credentials would be difficult to equal.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:05:41 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:30:49 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:15:34 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 03:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
开远市| 阿拉善盟| 云霄县| 增城市| 庆元县| 虞城县| 琼结县| 上林县| 绥滨县| 巴彦淖尔市| 定结县| 兴安县| 石门县| 礼泉县| 霍山县| 武威市| 云霄县| 崇义县| 雷山县| 朝阳区| 阿尔山市| 罗山县| 漯河市| 崇州市| 维西| 永和县| 建湖县| 清丰县| 东安县| 溧水县| 郓城县| 肥东县| 海伦市| 甘肃省| 元谋县| 甘孜县| 岳池县| 盐津县| 平乐县| 东明县| 湟源县|