Titlebook: Evaluation Models; Viewpoints on Educat George F. Madaus,Michael S. Scriven,Daniel L. Stuf Book 1983 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing 1983 Abstrac

Rankle

導(dǎo)師

Health and Poverty in Urban England,rhaps the most significant comparisons are those among the underlying theoretical assumptions on which the models are based. In this way, one might see how logically similar the models are to one another and determine what logical possibilities do and do not exist.

elastic

在駕駛

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66062-1ciding which of several reading programs their school district should adopt; when evaluating a school-bell schedule, they may mean finding out how popular the schedule is among students and faculty and what the advantages and disadvantages of several other bell schedules may be; when evaluating stud

OCTO

Larval Transport of the Japanese Eelndary-school level. In conferences of directors of course content improvement programs sponsored by the National Science Foundation, questions about evaluation are frequently raised.. Those who inquire about evaluation have various motives, ranging from sheer scientific curiosity about classroom eve

Exuberance

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5692-0 alternative to the views about evaluations that were most prevalent at that time — those oriented to objectives, testing, and experimental design. It emerged with other new conceptualizations, especially those developed by Scriven (1966) and Stake (1967). (For a discussion of these historical devel

fulmination

DEMN

Impact of Ultrasound on Food Constituents,rience that the programs do not always produce their intended improvements. Often, it is difficult to decipher whether programs have any impact at all, so complex is the ongoing social system into which programs are introduced and so inadequate are our methodologies for determining impact. To overco

acheon

親密

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7339-1ed their sentiment with the passage of Proposition 13. Only now, after the attending emotionalism has subsided, are the cold, disheartening facts and consequences becoming evident. Clearly, the vote was based more on frustration than on informed understanding of what the law would actually accomplis