Titlebook: Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups; Eric van Um Book 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 Terrorism.Explanatory P

加強防衛(wèi)

crockery

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93827-7 terror attacks had created fear throughout the country, cost the lives of 34 people, and injured many more (Seils, 2008). The group’s campaign of violence had not, however, brought about the political change desired by the RAF. It had not led to a popular mass uprising, and it had not created the socialist utopia of which the group had dreamed.

malapropism

maudtin

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0231-3e prompted many to doubt terrorists’ sanity. In this view, terrorists are considered irrational in the sense that they deviate from medically sane behavior. Accordingly, terrorists have been described as mentally abnormal, disturbed or crazy, and sometimes even as “mad” or “evil” (see Merkl, 1987b: 51; Ruby, 2002: 17; Witte, 2005: 72-74).

獸群

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627239h links to Iraq tried to blow up the . in Manila, the capital city of the Philippines. The two attempted to plant the bomb in the dark, yet by accident set the device’s timer backward instead of forward. This caused the bomb to explode prematurely, killing one of the attackers and wounding the other.

FLASK

悅耳

thrombosis

highly contested. Increased knowledge of the political rationality model not only promises added value for terrorism research itself, but also for social sciences more generally..978-3-658-11538-8978-3-658-11539-5

Narrative

AXIOM