Titlebook: Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups; Eric van Um Book 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 Terrorism.Explanatory P

加入

978-3-658-11538-8Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

browbeat

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11539-5Terrorism; Explanatory Power; Rational Choice Theory; Inter-Group Violence; Terrorist Groups’ Political

迎合

打折

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/317263.jpg

擁護(hù)者

Melanocytes

Conceptual Considerations,ittle more than the fact that terrorism is difficult to define. As a consequence, more than 100, if not more than 200, modern definitions of terrorism have been formulated (Easson and Schmid, 2011). These emphasize different aspects of terrorism, such as the underlying motivations, applied tactics, or chosen targets.

撫育

The Puzzle of the Political Ineffectiveness of Terrorist Groups, terror attacks had created fear throughout the country, cost the lives of 34 people, and injured many more (Seils, 2008). The group’s campaign of violence had not, however, brought about the political change desired by the RAF. It had not led to a popular mass uprising, and it had not created the socialist utopia of which the group had dreamed.

mechanical

George F. Madaus,Daniel L. Stufflebeamine – General Command, from which the PLF had broken away one year earlier. The bombing was the climax of a feud that had been going on between the two groups since then and which crippled the PLF for years (Dolnik, 2007: 87-91).

控制

狂怒

Book 2016nent in terrorism research. But, at the same time, their empirical power remains highly contested. Increased knowledge of the political rationality model not only promises added value for terrorism research itself, but also for social sciences more generally..