Titlebook: Ethnography after Humanism; Power, Politics and Lindsay Hamilton,Nik Taylor Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

領(lǐng)巾

Indecisive

Why Ethnography?creative directions to enhance understanding of human–animal contexts and, in doing so, take research beyond the narrow confines of traditional and hegemonic humanism. In what follows we begin to explore this argument by considering the case for . by outlining its history as an approach; a necessary

我怕被刺穿

充氣球

努力趕上

People Writing for Animalsof underlining rather than questioning hegemonic norms about particular groups. It may inadvertently reproduce myths and create “master statuses” (Becker, 1963)—such as young people are dangerous or problematic (Cohen, 1972)—by “fetishizing” and “exoticising” these individuals as Others.

鉗子

Deadpan

Abduct

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48622-1als in our research. With the metaphor of voice in mind, we introduce some of the political and philosophical difficulties of posthuman research by outlining the interconnected nature of epistemology, power and method and shed light on a number of complexities that emerge when one scrutinises humanist claims to knowledge about animals.

cogitate

Brandon Noia,Krishnendu Chakrabartyf the senses” (Howes & Classen, 2013), with vision occupying the uppermost position, and have rightly called for this to be challenged methodologically, not by ignoring vision or relegating it to the sidelines, but by expanding out from it and considering it alongside other senses.

痛得哭了

pecies relationships in organizations.Uniquely draws from mu.This book argues that qualitative methods, ethnography included, have tended to focus on the human at the cost of understanding humans and animals in relation, and that ethnography should evolve to account for the relationships between hum