Titlebook: Ethnography after Humanism; Power, Politics and Lindsay Hamilton,Nik Taylor Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

BULK

書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism被引頻次




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism年度引用




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism讀者反饋




書目名稱Ethnography after Humanism讀者反饋學科排名

FIN

Esalate

Lindsay Hamilton,Nik TaylorOffers an in-depth consideration of the political, philosophical and embedded power structures of methodological choices in studying multi-species relationships in organizations.Uniquely draws from mu

鐵砧

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/316343.jpg

probate

Calculation of Eddy Current Lossesd a series of ethnographic vignettes of people working with animals in some capacity or other, from those in caring occupations, such as sanctuary volunteers, to those at the opposite end of the spectrum working in abattoirs. We spent many hours, days and, in fact, years interviewing people in, and

lactic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19285-2by a strong liberal and emancipatory agenda which lends itself to critical, boundary-pushing and inclusive research. This makes a good starting point for considerations of multi-species settings that, by their very nature, push taken-for-granted (academic and epistemological) boundaries. The second

lactic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48622-1and practical approaches to the study of social life that we think make an ideal starting point for developing new posthuman or multi-species methods. In this chapter, we continue building our argument that such methods are needed by considering . we should listen to—and for—the voices of other anim

Metastasis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45667-5han as objects or materials. We are particularly excited by the prospect of ethnographies that account for the complexities of the relationships between humans and other species, rather than play to the reductive traditional dichotomies that have partitioned animals from mainstream social science. W

Brocas-Area

Design-Oriented Analysis of Structuresnoring animals contributes to their oppression by presupposing and shoring up the ideology of human centrality. Persisting with humanist agendas perpetuates the colonisation of knowledge production to the detriment of rich and subtle multi-species accounts (Davis & Craven, 2011, p. 191). We need met

離開真充足