Titlebook: Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman; Western and Buddhist Gordon F. Davis Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Spr

necrosis

書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman被引頻次




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman年度引用




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman讀者反饋




書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

falsehood

Self-Sceptical Ethics and Selfless Morality: A Historical and Cross-Cultural Overview,th an overview of the various perspectives presented by the other contributors to this volume, and some common threads running through different segments of the volume; for example, some perspectives favour reductionist accounts of selfhood, while some favour non-reductionist accounts, and this diff

Amorous

The Ethics of Self-Knowledge in Platonic and Buddhist Philosophy,hapter closes with a review of an apparent tension, shared by both traditions, between the goals of embodied social virtue and world-transcendence. The Platonic philosopher and the Mahayāna Bodhisattva both experience a liberating insight which motivates them to return to the “cave” of social servic

不在灌木叢中

Detachment in Buddhist and Stoic Ethics: , and , and Equanimity,mpassion and is conceived of as a tool for virtuous emotional engagement. This model challenges some influential interpretations of Buddhist conceptions of detachment that reduce them to one of the Stoic models, either the extirpation of emotions or resilience to threat to agency.

錯(cuò)事

不易燃

不易燃

欲望

RECUR

Selfless Care? Heidegger and ,,of the self as a single entity but nonetheless affirms the value of assertive will to power, an ideal that is the opposite of Buddhist selflessness.?An exploration of these themes through a comparative focus on Heidegger and . helps to identify various senses in which the self could be said to “be”

Calculus

,Echoes of Anattā and Buddhist Ethics in William James and Bertrand Russell,ions of self-transcendence are treated sympathetically. The chapter ends with a consideration of various points of contact between James, Russell, and Buddhism. Russell, a friend and interlocutor of James, was impressed by aspects of Buddhism from an early age, and I discuss and examine the parallel