Titlebook: Equality, Participation, Transition; Essays in Honour of Vojmir Frani?evi? (Professor of Economics),Milica Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan,

browbeat

嘲弄

簡潔

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4828-0vements of the left. The moral case for egalitarian redistribution was clear, and its practical implementation commanded wide support among workers and the less well off. But radical egalitarianism today is the orphan of a defunct socialism. The unruly and abandoned child of the liberal enlightenmen

任命

,Wirkungsweise und Aufbau eines Antik?rpers,ated by Kuznets (1955). Kuznets’ hypothesis is briefly reviewed in Section 4.2. It provides an indispensable background to our ‘a(chǎn)ugmented’ Kuznets’ hypothesis which is formulated in Section 4.3. The empirical assessment of our hypothesis is presented in Section 4.4. The hypothesis is tested on a cro

Aviary

falsehood

滋養(yǎng)

4-Aminoquinolines and Mannich Bases professor Horvat has been the leading economist who devoted his rich scientific work to the development of the concept of workers’ self-management in the Marxist tradition. He has also popularized the concept among the Western and Eastern socialist economists and has had a significant number of fol

CROW

RENAL

Clinical Trials — Phases I and IIe owned or controlled sector in large parts of the globe. But these developments have also highlighted some fundamental weaknesses and deficiencies in the traditional self-management literature (see, for example, Ward, 1958; Vanek, 1970; Meade, 1972; Bonin, Jones and Putterman, 1993). These question

帽子